• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rankings should be win based
#21
(02-14-2019, 08:22 PM)Alto Wrote: ????????? do you even know what a strawman is?

A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.

source(s): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent. while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent. while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent. while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent. while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent. while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent. while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent. while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.


literally no one said "thats the way we always did it lol"

if a team wins, then they win. a win is a win, which is the argument both me and nyxi brought up. on the day of the match, when the match mattered, the team that wins is better. thats why FF should be higher in the seed (using FF as an example, since spu made the thread and i think its a good example of the W/L not really mattering in seed). yes, match points matter, which is why IN MY ORIGINAL POST i said that they should be the tiebreaker between teams with the same record. but you should play to win. if you cant win your match, that sucks and at least you get some match points. otherwise who cares who wins. what is the point of playing for competition if it doesnt matter who wins, as long as both teams get a good amount of match points (such as winning 4-3 on koth). it barely gives you any sort of advantage, unless it really comes down to the wire (which, in invite it may because there were literally 5 matches). but in every other div, winning practically means nothing as long as you get good match points. that wouldnt be an awful system, if losing pl 2-0 didnt fucking gut your entire team. that's no match points for a full week of playing. its easier to win 2-0 on pl than 4-0 on koth. this system just means losing 2-0 on 2 payload maps basically fucks over your team.
plug walk


Messages In This Thread
Rankings should be win based - by pajaro - 02-14-2019, 03:48 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by SpotlightR - 02-14-2019, 03:57 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by fruitcup - 02-14-2019, 04:02 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by duck - 02-14-2019, 04:09 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by nyxi - 02-14-2019, 04:23 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by Bowl.knd - 02-14-2019, 04:29 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by perenne - 02-14-2019, 04:41 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by fruitcup - 02-14-2019, 06:04 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by fruitcup - 02-14-2019, 06:38 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by Alto - 02-14-2019, 06:03 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by nyxi - 02-14-2019, 06:38 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by perenne - 02-14-2019, 07:09 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by Alto - 02-14-2019, 08:07 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by perenne - 02-14-2019, 08:15 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by Alto - 02-14-2019, 08:22 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by perenne - 02-14-2019, 08:29 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by Alto - 02-14-2019, 08:50 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by perenne - 02-14-2019, 08:59 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by Alto - 02-14-2019, 09:03 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by nyxi - 02-14-2019, 09:04 PM
RE: Rankings should be win based - by Dimento.knd - 02-14-2019, 09:09 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)